Questions posed to Councillors

Below are a list of questions that I have asked local Councillors about the development. I will complete their replies as I receive them.

1) "106" Money
2) New library and community centre
3) Old Library
4) Lease and payback time
5) No details on official Enfield Website
6) Little detail in local papers
7) Catholic Church Objections
8) The Townhouse
9) Road System
10) New ideas for the Town Development
11) Old Cinema/Bingo Hall off Market Square
Follow-up letter to Paul Humphreys

1)   “106” Money

Is it correct that the “106” money will be sufficient to build the structure of the new library and community centre, but will not be enough to fit them out? How do Enfield Council propose to raise the funds for this?

s106 monies are not involved in the delivery of the proposed new Central Library and Cultural facility, as the funding is dealt with in the development agreement. The final costs of fitting out the proposed facilities are not known, as the detailed design is not yet complete. However, the fitting‑out costs are in part covered by a premium payment by the developer. Depending on the level of the remaining costs the Council will be considering how best these should be funded depending on the timing of the requirement. It should also be borne in mind that the Council will be seeking grant funding wherever possible for appropriate elements of the scheme, again depending on timing and availability of such funding.
- Paul Humphreys, Head of Corporate Asset Management, 20th May 2002

Top

2)   New library and community centre

Do we really need a new library at this location?  Would it not be better to build one slightly out of town, with free parking, good transport links and sufficient space to make a library that had enough space for the future. The current library can carry on as normal, and act as a satellite to the main library.  What are the requirements and benefits of the new library and community centre?

Since writing this, I have suggested that the Council might use the Eastern Energy site in Carterhatch Lane for a new central library. If you have any suggestions, you can send an email to Jane Tebbutt and Enfield Council.
 
Regarding the possible museum within the civic build, it has been mentioned that people would rather visit a museum within a park setting then during a shopping trip.
 

The evidence from other London Boroughs and indeed in Enfield itself (with the relocation of Edmonton's library from Fore Street to Edmonton Green Shopping Centre) shows that usage of libraries located in the heart of town centres rises dramatically compared with those at the periphery.
- Paul Humphreys, Head of Corporate Asset Management, 20th May 2002

Top

3)   Old Library

If the new library in the multi-story car park does go ahead as planned, firstly how will the fitting of it be paid for?  What is planned for the old library?

I have already dealt with the issues around the fitting out costs. In terms of the future of the existing Central Library this is a matter that the Council will be considering in due course. However, the Council recognises the value of the current building and will be seeking to ensure that whatever the future use, the building is retained. It is too early, given that the building would not be likely to be vacated until 2005, to finalise such future use at this stage.
- Paul Humphreys, Head of Corporate Asset Management, 20th May 2002

Top

4)   Lease and payback time

Is it correct that the council are granting a 250 year lease on the land that is being developed?  Is it also correct that Laings intend to make back their money within 7 years.  Are Enfield underselling this land?

It is correct that a 250 year lease will be granted. This is the normal commercial arrangement for this type of development. However, please note that the lease will be granted to the fund, not the developer. I can assure you that the property and legal advice to the Council in these matters is of the highest quality and always ensure that the Council receives best consideration.
- Paul Humphreys, Head of Corporate Asset Management, 20th May 2002

Top

5)   No details on official Enfield Website

I am concerned that there is no details whatsoever on the official Enfield Council website.  I have searched several times for any details of the development and found nothing.  Why is this?  I have also searched Enfield Councils paper and only found two references; one was about the compulsory purchase public enquiry and the other was about the affect on car park revenue the development will have.  Should the Council not be publishing more information on such an important topic?

Since writing this the council have published some details on the development.  It explains the process so far.  Visit http://www.enfield.gov.uk/towndev.htm  There are still no pictures of the proposed development or details of the plans.

Throughout the scheme development a considerable amount of information has been published and press releases provided. We are looking at placing more information on this type of schemes on the Web site, and apologise for this not being in place at present.
- Paul Humphreys, Head of Corporate Asset Management, 20th May 2002

Top

6)   Little detail in local papers

There also appears to be very little detail about the development within the local papers.  Does this indicate a lack of information to them too?  Does the Council issue press releases that are not published about the development?

The Council has issued press releases as has the developer, I have a file full of press cuttings for this scheme, and if you contact the local papers they may be able to assist you.
 

Top

7)   Catholic Church Objections

Is it correct that the Catholic Church have withdrawn their objections to the multi-story car park being built so close to the road and to the church?  Is this related to an issue about possible future planning permission problems for their school when it becomes vacant?

The Catholic Church raised an objection to the Compulsory Purchase Order, which was withdrawn during the Inquiry. The objection related to issues along the boundary and these were resolved through negotiation with the Diocese. There is no relation between the Retail development scheme and the future of the St. Anne's school site.
- Paul Humphreys, Head of Corporate Asset Management, 20th May 2002

Top

8)   The Townhouse

I object strongly to the compulsory purchase and demolition of the Townhouse.  This building provides a very practical and popular local attraction. It has visitors from around the World for its Tango, Salsa and Rock n Roll events.  It also provides a young persons disco on a Saturday.  This facility is unlikely to be replaced in Enfield Town and I think it would be a great loss to the community. Do you know of any plans to replace this facility?

I note your objection to the CPO of the Town House. The owner of the Town House also objected, and attended the Inquiry in February. The inspector will have taken account of this objection in his report. The proposed cultural facility would be able to cater for some of the activities you list. The developer is in discussion with the owner of the Town House and at present I do not know if relocation will be the result. The future of the Town House as a business is of course a matter for the owners to consider, but will to a great degree depend on the availability of suitable premises, and the financial viability of such a business in any alternative premises.
 

Top

9)   Road System

It does not matter what the developers plan for the road system, as all the roads leading in and out of Enfield Town are single lane small roads.  The current system provides enough throughput, it is the exit/entry routes that block the system up.  What studies have been produced of this and have they been published?

Transportation studies have been undertaken by the developer for the Planning application and these are public documents.
- Paul Humphreys, Head of Corporate Asset Management, 20th May 2002

Top

10)  New ideas for the Town Development

I have a few ideas that I would like to mention.  I think that the car parking should go one storey underground across the entire area of the two current car parks with entrances from London Rd Southbound next to Woolworths (Curtain Mill side), and London Rd Northbound next to the Catholic Church.  The exits would be by Sydney Road (south of Cecil Road) Northbound and Westbound.  On top of the north car park could be outwardly facing shops on Sydney Road that curve round into Cecil Road.  A service yard behind them could also be accessed from London Road next to Woolworths.

On the opposite side of Cecil Road, could be another line of outwardly facing shops with a small service road along the back.  Behind this could be an open garden area with a square and a water feature, with perhaps a couple of cafes.

I have started to draw some plans of this, and would be happy to send them to you if you were interested.

I note with interest your ideas for the Town. The development of a retail scheme has to work both in design terms and commercial viability terms. By this I mean that the costs of construction and the value generated through rental income have to balance within the appraisal. This is very complex and is why the selected developer is expert in their field. The Council is now committed legally to the current scheme and subject to a few outstanding conditions being satisfied I would expect the scheme as approved to proceed. Therefore whilst I thank you for your interest in the design issues I would not encourage you to spend further time on drawing them up.
- Paul Humphreys, Head of Corporate Asset Management, 20th May 2002

Top

11)  Old Cinema/Bingo Hall off Market Square

While the council is compulsory purchasing in the Town Centre, why doesn’t it purchase the Bingo Hall at the same time and incorporate that into the new development.  This would make an excellent site for a small shopping mall, or community centre or perhaps the library.

A Council is only able to seek to use its powers of compulsory purchase if it can prove that the acquisition of a property interest is vitally important for the delivery of a scheme (and is in the public interest). The Council is very concerned indeed about the future of the ex‑Gala Bingo Hall, and has been seeking to discuss its future with the owners. However, it would have been very difficult to justify its inclusion in the Enfield Town CPO as it was not required for the delivery of the scheme. We will continue to encourage the owners to bring forward a suitable scheme for the future of this important site.
- Paul Humphreys, Head of Corporate Asset Management, 20th May 2002

Top

HOME Updated 05/06/2002